Search This Site:
CURRENT EVENTS
 

August 2008 Newsletter (PDF)
READ NOW!

Klasko Named Corporate Immigration Lawyer of the Year
July 2008

Partners Named As Top Lawyers in Who's Who Legal
June 2008

USCIS Aids Individuals with H-1Bs Near Six Year Maximum by Limited Reopening of Premium Processing for Certain I-140 Petitions
June 12, 2008
USCIS has announced that, as of June 16, it will resume acceptance of requests for Premium Processing for employment-based immigrant visa petitions (I-140s) on a limited basis. More...

Leading Immigration Lawyer Joins Firm
Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP, is pleased to announce that Elise A. Fialkowski, formerly the head of the Immigration Law practice at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, has joined the Firm. More...

ALL Klasko Partners with Distinction
All of the partners of Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP are named in The Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers, and received the highest rating of "AV" from LexisNexis. More...

     
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS

Love Gone Awry

A Chinese student, who spoke little English, met the love of her life. The man, a U.S. citizen, had a great interest in visiting China with a Chinese native, and agreed to marry her for that purpose. He explained to her that that was the reason he was marrying her, but she didn't comprehend, thinking that she had found the man with whom she would spend the rest of her life. They filed an application for permanent residence based upon the marriage. Upon vigorous examination by an immigration examiner, the U.S. citizen husband admitted that the marriage was not based on an intention to live together. When the Chinese student discovered this, she was so distraught and depressed that she took an overdose; and landed in the hospital.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service denied the application for permanent residence and put the Chinese student in deportation proceedings. We successfully defended the Chinese student in immigration court in Chicago based on the fact that, although there was marriage fraud, she was not a party to the fraud and only her husband had committed the fraud. The INS then amended the complaint and alleged that she was deportable based on having violated her student status for missing classes during the period for which she was hospitalized. Again, in immigration court in Chicago, we successfully defended against this charge.

The INS then amended the charge one last time to allege that she was deportable based upon having lied on the INS form regarding her address, using the address of her husband. Finally, the Immigration Judge found her deportable on this last charge.

We filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals. After several years, the BIA reversed the order of the Immigration Judge and found her not deportable, since any misstatement regarding her address was an immaterial misrepresentation, not sufficient to create a ground of deportability for a student in otherwise valid student status.

 
Copyright © 2008 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.